As per Section (5)
of the Natural Health Products Regulations,
Health Canada:
Natural Health Products Directorate requires two types of reports to
be submitted, with the product licence application. The first is the
Evidence Summary Report, which is designed to provide
the Directorate assessor with information about the products safety
and efficacy. The second report is the Quality Summary Report,
which is organized to cover the specifications of the finished
product. The NHPD encourages applicants to devote sufficient time to
prepare clear and precise reports.
1. EVIDENCE SUMMARY
REPORT (Safety & Efficacy)
A. Evidence To Support Traditional Use
HOW CAN WE HELP?
B. Evidence To Support
Non-Traditional Use
2. QUALITY SUMMARY
REPORT
3. GOOD CLINICAL
PRACTICES AUDIT
A. Contract Research Organization (CRO) Evaluation
B. Essential Documents Audit
C. Clinical Research Documents
|
1. EVIDENCE
SUMMARY REPORT (Safety & Efficacy) |
The report template
contains three parts. Part one is to present evidence to
support the use of the product for each medicinal ingredient
provided on the product licence application form. Part two,
is allocated to provide information on the safety of the product
(the 12 safety factors). And the last part is to describe the
search strategy and the references.
The followings are
to display the NHPD requirements, and how QMRS
can assist you to fulfill these
requirements.
A.
Evidence To Support Traditional Use
Applicants must provide at least two independent references that
support the conditions of use. However, if one reference only is
available, an EXPERT OPINION REPORT would be considered
by the NHPD as a possible substitute for a second reference.
The regulations require that the experts committee must
comprise of minimum three people; at least one of them must have
a scientific qualifications including experience in research
methods and training in evidence-based health care.
HOW CAN WE HELP?
Being a Ph.D. degree
holder from University of London in the field of Human Nutrition
(1981), with a number of publications in Nutrition, Dietetic and
Health care, I am confident that
QMRS
can fulfill your need. Namely, the principal name could be one
of your EXPERT COMMITTEE MEMBERS. Please click on
Principal Message
to review my qualifications and publications (this information
needed also, by NHPD to fulfil the requirements for Third Party
Auditor/Quality Assurance Person).
We are also pleased
to point out that Dr. Victor Manolii (Ph.D from Odessa,
Moldova) with his 18 years of
scientific and practical experience in plant breeding, genetics,
biotechnology and molecular biology analysis, is one of our team
of experts. Therefore, his name and expertise is available for
your use.
Just send us your enquiry to
info@qmrs.com and we will
be very pleased to contribute to your success
B. Evidence
To Support Non-Traditional Use
The evidence requirements to support a non-traditional use claim
are more stringent than what is required to support a
traditional use. There are many types of evidence, but all are
based on scientific research, and findings. The following are
the many types of scientific evidence, which is accepted by NHPD.
A. Systematic Reviews
Reviewing scientific literature requires special skills, and
training. Also, to combine, and summarize the results of several
clinical trials using statistical methods involve a great deal
of expertise, and may be postgraduate education. Since
this type of evidence is considered the strongest level in the
“Strength of Evidence Grading System”, it should be the first
choice for any applicant.
QMRS
can help you in two ways:
YOU
can provide us with all scientific articles on your active
ingredient, and we will review it, analyze it, and summarize the
results to suit your recommended use.
OR,
we can also, search and gather the scientific data on your
behalf, then we can proceed with the analysis and summarize it
as explained earlier. Please contact us
directly
to discuss your needs.
B. Clinical Studies
Clinical studies
is considered by NHPD
as the best scientific evidence applicants could provide (level
I and II in the grading system).
The
fact is that, this approach is very costly, not only from the
monetary point of view, but also, requires a lot of time to
prepare for the study, and a very well established
organizational structure to allow for such an activity (even if
the project will be given to Clinical Research Organization).
Therefore, clinical studies may be not the first choice by many
companies. But, if the product is new, and there is little
available data on the product active ingredient(s), in such a
case, clinical studies will be necessary and not optional.
Let
us (QMRS)
help you to design a simple study to save your money. We can
also, supervise, and monitor the study as well as write, and
publish the results.
If
you are a small or medium size manufacturer, you will certainly,
benefit from our package, which include (in addition to
designing and monitoring the study), providing you with many
essential SOPs and Forms, which are written specifically for
clinical research activities. (see
DOCUMENTATION
SUPPORT
for the details).
C. Descriptive and Observations
Studies
As
NHPD indicated, “well-designed descriptive or observational
studies can also be classified as comparative studies,
correlation, and case-control studies, and such studies may also
provide valuable information”. These types of evidence
classified under level III in the “Evidence Grading System”.
It is
obvious that, such studies are less demanding compared with
clinical trials.
QMRS
can design with you these studies, to ensure you will pay less
money and receive adequate / accurate feedback to support your
product claim.
D. Other Evidences
Textbooks, pharmacopoeias, academic journals, reputable
regulatory agencies, and pre-clinical studies are all
high-quality source of information to support product claim. If
you do not have access to such sources, we can do the needed
search for you.
|
2. QUALITY SUMMARY REPORT |
This is the second type of evidence report required by HC: NHP
Directorate to support product registration. The objective of
this report is to provide the ministry with a description of the
product identity, purity, quality, potency, and tolerance
limits. The needed information is very technical; covering
aspects such as the manufacturing process, sterilization
process, analytical procedures, and its validation &
justification for use.
Obviously, these requirements involve a lot of work,
information, and expertise. To make your task easier,
QMRS
can provide you with the needed documents, (such as equipment &
facility qualifications, sterility tests, and materials
specifications policies). Please check
ON-LINE PURCHASE,
and
DOCUMENTATION SUPPORT
for the details).
|
3. GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICES AUDIT
|
Good Clinical Practices means that the clinical trials
are designed
and conducted according to specific requirements (practices) to
ensure the protection of the rights, safety and well-being of
clinical trial subjects and other persons. (Health Canada;
Guidance for clinical trial sponsors: clinical trial
applications, 2003).
Health Canada also define clinical trials as “an investigation
in respect of a drug for use in humans that involves human
subjects, and that is intended to discover or verify the
clinical, pharmacological or pharmacodynamic effects of the
drug, identify any adverse events in respect of the drug, study
the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of the
drug or ascertain the safety or efficacy of the drug.”
Auditing is the process of examining all trial-related
activities, and documentations to determine whether the
evaluated activities were conducted, and the data was recorded,
analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol,
sponsor’s SOP’s, the generally accepted clinical practices, and
the applicable regulatory requirements.
Audit Objectives
In view of the above background, clinical trials sponsors need
to establish a clinical research program to fulfill the above
indicated requirements. Specifically, the purpose of clinical
trials audit is to answer many questions such as:
Are the investigator(s) qualified to conduct the trial?
Is the institution / site well
equipped?
Is the Research Ethics Board (REB)
to approve the study, meets health
Canada requirements?
Did the subjects receive the
product under investigations (Drug accountability)?
Was the informed consent form available for all trial-enrolled
subjects?
Were any adverse reactions, or
case of death reported?
Was the result correctly reported?
Was the study protocol well
followed?
Is
there monitoring system in place?
Are
all clinical trial documentations established, and available
(such as sponsor trial
master file, and trial site file)?
Needless to say, these are not all of the questions, which need
to be answered. In brief, a periodic audit of all activities
related to clinical trials must be conducted , and documented in
order to ensure compliance with current regulations.
QMRS
ROLE
QMRS team can
help you for better preparation in:
A. Contract Research Organization (CRO) Evaluation
As per the International Conference
on Harmonization (ICH) definition, CRO, “is a person, or an
organization (commercial, academic, or other), contracted by the
sponsor to perform one or more of a sponsor’s trial related
duties, and functions".
In accordance with the above definition,
QMRS
can evaluate the qualifications of the CRO by conducting the
following activities:
-
Clinical laboratory evaluation
-
Contract monitor evaluation
-
Data management evaluation
An audit checklist will be available upon request for each one
of these parameters. You might choose to purchase the checklist
to do the evaluation by your self for your self
(see
DOCUMENTATION SUPPORT).
Or, you might ask us to help you; where our experts will be
pleased to do these tasks on your behalf in a cost-effective
manner. Our audit approach, procedures, and rate will be similar
to the GMP audit. However, we will be prepared to customaries
our methodology to suit your needs. Just call us at 613-526
0471, or write to
info@qmrs.com for free
consultation.
B. Essential Documents Audit
We can assess the adequacy (completion) of the clinical trials
essential documents in the investigator/institution site, and/or
your (the sponsor) files. This evaluation could be conducted:
-
Before the clinical trial
commence.
-
During the clinical trial
implementation.
-
Or/and after completion, or
termination of the clinical trial.
QMRS
prepared detailed checklists, and forms for your use.
Please, click on:
ON-LINE PURCHASE,
and
DOCUMENTATION SUPPORT
for more information.
Although
QMRS
documents are well designed, and easy to use by your employees,
our experts are still ready to travel anywhere to conduct the
audit on your behalf.
C. Clinical Research Documents
QMRS
already prepared many Standard Operating Procedures, and forms
to be available for your use. It might be important to mention
that the documents contents are based on the ICH; GCP:
Consolidated Guideline; 1997, which is adopted by Health Canada.
The lists of documents are displayed under
DOCUMENTATION SUPPORT, and could be purchased on line
ON-LINE PURCHASE.
If you are unable to find specific titles (subjects), please let
us know, because many documents are under development /review,
and could be available within a very short time upon your
request.
In
brief, whether you are seeking traditional or non-traditional
product licensing, we are fully equipped to prepare your
registration package, and manage all the communications
with Health Canada.
It
is worth mentioning that this activity will be directed in
QMRS by Dr. H. ASHAER (M.D, M.Sc).
The
sponsor shall record, handle and store all information in
respect of a clinical trial in a way that allows its complete
and accurate reporting as well as its interpretation and
verification.
Source: Canada Gazette (June 18,
2003), Natural Health Products Regulations, Part 4:
Records, 76.(1).